Re: Bush Ordered 911
From: Eyeball Kid (jfm6949_at_nospam.ispwest.com)
Date: 02/09/05
- Next message: Tim.Ward: "Re: Bush Ordered 911"
- Previous message: Eyeball Kid: "Re: Bush Ordered 911"
- In reply to: Tim.Ward: "Re: Bush Ordered 911"
- Next in thread: Gunner: "Re: Bush Ordered 911"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 13:06:55 -0800
In article <1107971023.707852.40440@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>,
Tim.Ward <Tim.Ward@AvidID.com> wrote:
> Eyeball Kid wrote:
>
> > There's one "conspiracy crapola" theory to which I don't subscribe.
> > That's the one put forth by the government.
> >
> > Because you find an alternative explanation for the collapse of the
> WTC
> > towers (are you also including WTC7, with another tortured
> explanation
> > that requires a suspension of belief in natural law? Have you
> listened
> > to the Silverstein interview?) an unpleasant indication that your
> > government may be part of the PROBLEM doesn't necessarily mean that
> > those who point out the obvious are crazy.
> > An indication that you are in denial is the fact that you are
> focusing
> > on discrediting the messenger, not the message. You can't deal with
> the
> > facts because they contradict your beliefs. Cognitive dissonance can
> > get you irritated, yes?
> >
> >
> > E. K.
>
> Okay, so I wade through this thing, and I get down to the last
> paragraph, which goes:
>
> <begin quote>
> In the case of the twin towers, the technical problem of how to account
> for the immense
> quantities of energy released would seem to point to an energy source
> beyond the
> capabilities of conventional controlled demolition. For a possible
> explanation of what
> kind of energy source could have been at work, we must turn our
> attention to the realm of
> new physical principles, and thus to the class of directed energy
> weapons which are
> probably most familiar to the general public in connection with
> President Reagan's socalled
> star wars speech of March 23, 1983. We may be dealing here with high
> energy
> microwave interferometry using coaxial beams for constructive and
> destructive
> interference. The inherent problem with this conjecture, as engineer
> Ken Jenkins has
> pointed out, is that such a device would require a power cable half a
> meter in diameter,
> and the presence of such a power cable has not been demonstrated. The
> solution to this
> problem will indeed require more time and research.
> <end quote>
I don't know where you got the quote. You didn't cite your source. But
from what you pasted, the author seems to be making an hypothesis
that's far more complicated than it needs to be.
I have video footage from mainstream sources which clearly shows the
exploding charges in timed sequences on the floors of the WTCs,
including WTC7, as the buildings collapsed. It's a simple matter of
watching the explosions shoot horizontally from the building floors
four or five stories above the disintegrating upper portions of the
collapsing buildings. These sequenced explosions in other deliberately
imploded buildings have been filmed dozens of times by media sources
for many years. It's a no-brainer, like watching a home run on the
sports highlights shows. Same swing, same crack of the bat, same
result.
E. K.
>
>
> So, apparently the "common sense" conclusion is that it was done with
> the aid of the Vogon Constructor Fleet.
>
>
>
> Tim Ward
>
-- "Honestly, I think we should just trust our president in every decision that he makes and we should just support that."-Britney Spears, 9/2003 "The American Way of Life is not negotiable." Dick Cheney, 2001 Free humor. Whenever you want. http://www.psmueller.com
- Next message: Tim.Ward: "Re: Bush Ordered 911"
- Previous message: Eyeball Kid: "Re: Bush Ordered 911"
- In reply to: Tim.Ward: "Re: Bush Ordered 911"
- Next in thread: Gunner: "Re: Bush Ordered 911"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
