Re: Another "Intense" Fire Leaves Building Standing
From: Ford Prefect (tommysfanclub_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 02/23/05
- Next message: Ford Prefect: "Re: Another "Intense" Fire Leaves Building Standing"
- Previous message: Ford Prefect: "Re: Another "Intense" Fire Leaves Building Standing"
- In reply to: rarebit_at_slipgate.com: "Re: Another "Intense" Fire Leaves Building Standing"
- Next in thread: rarebit_at_slipgate.com: "Re: Another "Intense" Fire Leaves Building Standing"
- Reply: rarebit_at_slipgate.com: "Re: Another "Intense" Fire Leaves Building Standing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 18:15:56 GMT
WOW! You got a link for something a bit more credible for ID of the
"victims" of 77 than urban legends?
<rarebit@slipgate.com> wrote in message
news:1109176119.419321.226250@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Dale Eastman wrote:
> > rarebit@slipgate.com wrote:
> >
> > About swallowing the neocon bait, hook, line, and sinker.
> >
> >
> > Some simple pictures to look at.
> >
> > 1. The tail fin of the alleged 757 at the pentagon.
> > http://bedoper.com/eastman/ldsxox1.gif (no relation)
> >
> > 2. The actual size of a 757 compared to the pentagon in a computer
> > generated TO SCALE image.
> > http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911/pentagon/images/simulation1.jpg
> >
> > The Boeing 757 is long enough to fit six of its large tail
> > fins along its 155 ft. back like the plates on the back of a
> > Stegosaurus dinosaur, whereas the yellow parking-pass cabinet
> > in the security cam picture only conceals at most four
> > lengths of the tail-fin image showing above and behind the
> > cabinet. Thus the cabinet can conceal the body "Stegosaurus"
> > with with four tail-fin plates of this size showing, but
> > cannot conceal all of a longer Stegosaurus with six such
> > plates along its back. By this reckoning fully one third of
> > the the body length of a "six-fin" plane would have to be
> > showing beyond the obstructing cabinet given the size of the
> > tail fin showing. An F-16 fighter jet, on the other hand,
> > would be concealed by the construction because it has a
> > "four-fin" body type.
> >
> > My "Stegoboeing" is only 5 fins.
> >
> >
> > 3. The image used to create the "Stegosaurus" Boeing.
> > http://www.911wasalie.com/phpwebsite/images/photoalbum/4/nu612a.gif
> >
> > 4. The "Stegoboeing".
> > http://home.sprintmail.com/~dalereastman/images/modnu612a.GIF
> >
> > 5. The alleged 757 in the pentagon image.
> > http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911/pentagon/images/pentani.jpg
> >
> > 6. The Stegoboeing's fins, and MISSING NOSE.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > "You take the BLUE PILL, you wake up in your own bed,
> > and you BELIEVE WHAT YOU WANT TO.
> > You take the RED PILL, you stay in WONDERLAND,
> > and I'll show you HOW DEEP THE RABBIT HOLE GOES." - Morpheus
> >
> > red pill:
> > http://www.861.info/ <--- "They" don't want you to look here.
>
> Apparently you and your team of geniuses didn't see these links-
>
> Eyewitness-
> http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/blflight77w.htm
>
> Blackboxes-
>
http://urbanlegends.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/14%5FAPboxes.html
>
> Forensic ID of ALL the victims but one aboard that flight-
>
http://urbanlegends.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://www.dcmilitary.com/army/stripe/6%5F48/national%5Fnews/12279%2D1.html
>
> ALL the victims aboard 77 identified but one. Dale, your clearly
> talking out your ass again.
>
> You obviously chose to ignore these the first time. Here they are
> again-
>
> http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/blflight77.htm
> http://urbanlegends.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://paul...
>
> http://news.uns.purdue.edu/UNS/html4ever/020910.Sozen.Pentagon.html
> http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/cmh/simulation/
> http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
> http://english.pravda.ru/main/2002/09/10/36235.html
> http://www.purportal.com/special/9-11/
> http://www.spinsanity.org/columns/20020412.html
> http://brian.carnell.com/archives/years/2002/05/000020.html
> http://brian.carnell.com/archives/years/2001/11/000021.html
> http://www.montalk.net/pentagon.html
> http://www.laweekly.com/ink/02/35/dissonance-cooper.php
> http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/europe/06/26/france.book/
> http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/09/10/ar911.osama.exclusive/
> http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/5/29/71547.shtml
> http://www.nationalreview.com/goldberg/goldberg041202.asp
> http://www.alternet.org/story/12536
> http://mckinneysucks.blogspot.com/
> http://www.thenation.com/capitalgames/index.mhtml?bid=3&pid=66
> http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/11/chronology.attack/
> http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/4/22/175758.shtml
>
- Next message: Ford Prefect: "Re: Another "Intense" Fire Leaves Building Standing"
- Previous message: Ford Prefect: "Re: Another "Intense" Fire Leaves Building Standing"
- In reply to: rarebit_at_slipgate.com: "Re: Another "Intense" Fire Leaves Building Standing"
- Next in thread: rarebit_at_slipgate.com: "Re: Another "Intense" Fire Leaves Building Standing"
- Reply: rarebit_at_slipgate.com: "Re: Another "Intense" Fire Leaves Building Standing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]