Re: French Nuclear = Solar/Sterling
From: Brad Guth (ieisbradguth_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/16/05
- Next message: Brad Guth: "Re: French Nuclear = Solar/Sterling"
- Previous message: Brad Guth: "Re: French Nuclear = Solar/Sterling"
- In reply to: Brad Guth: "French Nuclear = Solar/Sterling"
- Next in thread: Brad Guth: "Re: French Nuclear = Solar/Sterling"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 16 Mar 2005 15:48:09 -0800
Obviously the supposed honest notions of our trustworthy ENRON power
utility wizards and Gods that'll eventually accomplish those nifty
fusion reactions offers humanity the ultimate and bar none the
biggest-bang per kg solution for safely exceeding the solar/sterling
potential of cleanly extracting upon average 200 w/m2. I'd have to
perceive that possibly as great as 10 kw/m2 of fusion derived energy is
what could be devised upon, although even a kw/m2 is five fold better
off than a typical American nuclear reactor method that somewhat
environmentally sucks (though less overall sucking than NG, coal and
oil).
According to many that know a whole lot more than myself, a kilogram
worth of He3(Helium-3) is supposedly offering an equivalent of
something better than 2.2 Million tonnes worth of Coal.
"James A Davis; The energy release of the reaction is 3.52E14 Joules
per kg of reactants (H2 and He3). For comparison the H2/O2 *chemical*
reaction releases 1.33E7 Joules per kg of reactants.
"Mo; While it's true that to produce roughly 70 tons of helium 3, for
example, a million tons of lunar soil would need to be heated to 1,470
degrees Fahrenheit (800 degrees Celsius) to liberate the gas,
proponents say lunar strip mining is not the goal. 'There's enough in
the Mare Tranquillitatis alone to last for several hundred years,'
Schmitt said. The moon would be a stepping stone to other helium 3-rich
sources, such as the atmospheres of Saturn and Uranus."
I foresee no problems nor shortage of available energy for the likes of
processing lunar soil and basalt at better than 800°C, and certainly
no complications as to getting that substance safely and efficiently
exported to mother Earth.
Therefore my quest for eventually obtaining such clean energy on behalf
of humanity and our environment as obtained from our our nearby and
well preserved lunar He3 cash via the LSE-CM/ISS is not nearly as half
baked as you might think. Unfortunately, there's an ongoing
need-to-know and nondisclosure perpetrated cold-war policy of 'up
yours' that has been recently amended to our 'so what's the difference'
policy that absolutely sucks, especially if you're Islamic or Muslim
that so happen to be sitting on oil.
Thus for the moment, it seems French nuclear reactors at a forth the
cost of anything American, and at not a tenth the required space, this
alternative seems like the lesser of evils that honest folks can manage
without getting ourselves smack into another not so cold-war
tit-for-tat of a energy pillaging war(s) of nuclear WMD proportions
that'll really suck if we keep excluding all factors of remorse, not to
mention the continued polluting of mother Earth and subsequent global
warming that sucks if you're too poor or just situated in the wrong
place as to cope with such.
Basic township that's situated upon Venus:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
Basic LSE (Lunar Space Elevator)
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Other available topics by; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm
- Next message: Brad Guth: "Re: French Nuclear = Solar/Sterling"
- Previous message: Brad Guth: "Re: French Nuclear = Solar/Sterling"
- In reply to: Brad Guth: "French Nuclear = Solar/Sterling"
- Next in thread: Brad Guth: "Re: French Nuclear = Solar/Sterling"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|