Re: Electrolysis is not always ludicrous...
- From: Don Lancaster <don@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 08:30:26 -0700
Dan Bloomquist wrote:
I think the plant near Barstow is still
Best, Dan.
Is that the one where the air conditioning for the control building used up TEN TIMES more electricity than the panels were producing?
-- Many thanks,
Don Lancaster Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552 voice: (928)428-4073 email: don@xxxxxxxxxx
Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com .
- References:
- Electrolysis is not always ludicrous...
- From: zoe_lithoi
- Re: Electrolysis is not always ludicrous...
- From: Tim.Ward
- Re: Electrolysis is not always ludicrous...
- From: raffaele.castagno@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Electrolysis is not always ludicrous...
- From: Dan Bloomquist
- Re: Electrolysis is not always ludicrous...
- From: raffaele.castagno@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Electrolysis is not always ludicrous...
- From: Dan Bloomquist
- Electrolysis is not always ludicrous...
- Prev by Date: Re: Cost of Generating Hydrogen Through Electrolysis
- Next by Date: Re: Electrolysis is not always ludicrous...
- Previous by thread: Re: Electrolysis is not always ludicrous...
- Next by thread: Re: Electrolysis is not always ludicrous...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|