Re: Electrolysis is not always ludicrous...

Peter Lowrie wrote: 
Dear Don

Don Lancaster wrote:

John Savage wrote:

Don Lancaster <don@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Silicon pv is the wrong horse to bet on because of its horrible 

inefficieny.

The faster that conventional si is flushed, the better. 


And replaced with what?


There is no need to replace an obvious failure.

The sooner the obvious failure is recognized and admitted to, the better and faster that alternatives can emerge.

Clearly waiting in the wings are Metalloradicals, photonic lattices, MEMS microantennas, variable workfunction, spread workfunction, quantum dots,... etc etc etc

See http://www.tinaja.com/glib/energyfun.pdf for details.

--
Many thanks,

Don Lancaster
Synergetics   3860 West First Street  Box 809  Thatcher, AZ 85552
voice: (928)428-4073 email: don@xxxxxxxxxx

Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com
.