Re: Hydrogen IS fuel
- From: Don Lancaster <don@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 10:14:32 -0700
Peter Lowrie wrote:
Combustion is defined by only three parameters, namely "fuel", "Oxidiser" and "Heat". Commonly known as the combustion triangle.
Clearly Oxygen does not burn and is therefore not a fuel but is the oxidiser that provides the fuel with a means to burn.
Heat does not burn, is not a fuel and is the product of the burning of a fuel.
Ipso facto Hydrogen is a fuel. To relegate it to the condition of an "energy carrier" is a mistaken semantical contrivance.
Furthermore, nothing is "consumed" in the oxidisation of Hydrogen. The original atoms are still there but now they're in a molecule that has taken part in a chemical reaction.
On a humorous note...Perfectly proportioned Hydrogen and Oxygen in it's liquid compressed state (liquid water gas) may be the safest fuel known inasmuch as it will put out a fire, something none of the other liquid fuels will do :-)
Your comments...
Not even wrong.
A fuel is a substance that is capable of adding NET energy to the on-the-books economy.
Hyerogen does not even come remotely close.
-- Many thanks,
Don Lancaster Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552 voice: (928)428-4073 email: don@xxxxxxxxxx
Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hydrogen IS fuel
- From: Clint Olsen
- Re: Hydrogen IS fuel
- References:
- Hydrogen IS fuel
- From: Peter Lowrie
- Hydrogen IS fuel
- Prev by Date: Re: Electrolysis is not always ludicrous...
- Next by Date: Re: methane reformation
- Previous by thread: Hydrogen IS fuel
- Next by thread: Re: Hydrogen IS fuel
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|