Re: Electrolysis is not always ludicrous...
- From: "BobG" <bobgardner@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 Jul 2005 13:35:20 -0700
Don says:
For every unusually rare system that may have paid back using bogus
accounting, there are many dozens that have not. All of which consume
energy and have to be billed against the total net energy balance.
=====================
Bob:
Thanks for the reply, Don. If you admit that there are SOME systems
that have paid off their cost, why does this represent bogus
accounting? I admit there are many systems not paid off, but you claim
over and over that NO PV SYSTEM has ever produced one watt. Surely you
can tone down this claim?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Electrolysis is not always ludicrous...
- From: Don Lancaster
- Re: Electrolysis is not always ludicrous...
- References:
- Re: Electrolysis is not always ludicrous...
- From: BobG
- Re: Electrolysis is not always ludicrous...
- From: Don Lancaster
- Re: Electrolysis is not always ludicrous...
- From: BobG
- Re: Electrolysis is not always ludicrous...
- From: Don Lancaster
- Re: Electrolysis is not always ludicrous...
- From: BobG
- Re: Electrolysis is not always ludicrous...
- From: Don Lancaster
- Re: Electrolysis is not always ludicrous...
- Prev by Date: Re: Do hyrogen and oxygen expand when burned together?
- Next by Date: Re: Do hyrogen and oxygen expand when burned together?
- Previous by thread: Re: Electrolysis is not always ludicrous...
- Next by thread: Re: Electrolysis is not always ludicrous...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|