Re: The SHEC scam unveiled by an insider


"Don W." <dNOSPAMwiddersAThotmail.com> wrote in message
news:lJidnZ3P19GkD27fRVn-iA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "Marc" <mdandml@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1123247002.614497.275230@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > No ***, she was going to keep our conversations confidential.
> > No surprise that debilitated half retards with a computer and a
> > bunsen burner would get his facts twisted and be reduced to
> > living on line. You can´t read, can you shmucko?
>
> Yes, she was going to keep the conversation confidential until YOU
> published it on the Internet. I don't suppose you asked her first for
> approval?
>
> Now you know from an 'insider' that SHEC doesn't even have a working
> technology! But that doesn't really matter, does it? You already
> convinced others that SHEC does have a working technology and you took
> their money. Your parents must be very proud.
>
> Don W.
>

Actually, from the quoted text in someone else's reply, the wording used
was:

"Please be assured that our correspondence will be confidential."

My dictionary says "2a communication by letters; also : the letters
exchanged ".....nothing in there about "conversations", it's pretty specific
that it refers to the written word, ergo, the "debilitated half retard with
a computer" who posted her correspondence on the world wide web, betrayed
her trust in confidentiality.

No surprise there.

Nor is there any surprise that SH*C appears to be a scam, as noted earlier.

Marco is now claiming he raised 1 million for them? A few weeks ago it was
2 million.......
Oh what tangled webs Marky weaves when he practices to deceive.......

K. Jones


.

Quantcast