Re: READ IT AND WEEP YOU POOR BASTARDS

On 19 Aug 2005 02:06:49 -0700, "Marc" <mdandml@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>From: b...@xxxxxxxxxx (Al)

>On 18 Aug 2005 06:35:07 -0700, "Marc" <mdan...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>Those are not my words, Al. Those are the words of a chick who has
>>been terminatated by the company for reasons disclosed to me by SHEC
>>Labs.
>
>Let me guess: for sending you damning insider information in
>confidence. Which you then posted publicly and world-wide with her
>name attached.
>
>Wrong, as usual.

Then please explain exactly why she got fired.

Was it for being stupid enough to communicate in confidence with a
scumbag like yourself, when she probably should have known that you'd
post her private note to you all over the world?

Or was it for exposing their little scam?

>Did she thank you for getting her fired?

>Slander, Al. You felonious piece of lying ***.

You can't be held liable for slander if it's true.

Oh, by the way, you're a fruitcake.

>>My posts are getting the job done, my friend. Don=3DB4t you worry your
>>head off.
>
>Getting what job done? Convincing people that you're a raving
>lunatic? I'll agree with you there. And casting doubt on the
>legitimacy of SHEC? I'd say you've done a pretty good job there as
>well.
>
>I believe you had an unhealthy dose of doubt before I had the
>displeasure of knowing you.

Nope. I had never heard of SHEC before you showed up here. Your
zealous praise of it raised my initial doubt. Looking into the
details on their web site increased my doubt further. And then your
posting claims that SHEC is a scam, and posting purported insider
information that seems to support those claims solidified my doubt.

SHEC may very well be a legitimate company. But based upon everything
you've provided to date, it sure looks like a scam.

>It=B4s not my job to legitimatize SHEC Labs, it=B4s theirs. I have done
>my job. Now it=B4s time to Make some GASH.
>
>You know, Al.

Exactly how do you plan to make cash? Do you really expect anybody to
invest in SHEC after hearing you call it a scam and reading the
damning insider information you post that seems to support your claim
that it's a scam?


.