Re: Friday Fun
- From: Mike McWilliams <michael.mcwilliamss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 14:58:46 -0700
Duke McMullan N5GAX wrote:
"Mike McWilliams" <michael.mcwilliamss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messageindeed it has nothing to do with energy or hydrogen, but manufacturing things on the sub-ten nanometer scale might be a corollory of this.
news:1142623359.821286@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Check out Figure 1.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v440/n7082/full/440283a.html
With DNA, anything is possible.
Now, I'm not going to accuse you of shilling for Nature (fine journal), but
you _are_ aware that the content is available only to subscribers, sites
with site licenses (libraries, etc.), and people willing to fork over $18 .
.. . aren't you?
And I'll suggest that, even with DNA, overunity energy schemes can be no
better than overunity energy scams. Not everything is possible -- at least,
with a realistically realizable probability.
d
PS -- I _haven't read the Nature article, so please be clear: I am not
asserting that the article is promoting or even addressing any overunity
energy stuff. It was just a (counter)example.
d
Basically they came up with a method to make 2D shapes using DNA. The article shows smiley faces and stars.
I imagine 3D shapes are in the works, and I think thats where it may get interesting.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Friday Fun
- From: Don Lancaster
- Re: Friday Fun
- From: Duke McMullan N5GAX
- Re: Friday Fun
- References:
- Friday Fun
- From: Mike McWilliams
- Re: Friday Fun
- From: Duke McMullan N5GAX
- Friday Fun
- Prev by Date: Re: Friday Fun
- Next by Date: Re: Friday Fun
- Previous by thread: Re: Friday Fun
- Next by thread: Re: Friday Fun
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading