Re: need information please!

If you burn it in an ICE, you get the efficiency of an ICE, a fuel cell
would be about 50-100% more efficient without the production of NOx. Also,
a fuel cell should be lighter. IMO it is only these benifits that
potentially make up for the other shortcomings.

It is only the
"Don Widders" <widders@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:BeWdnWIdt_mocdLZRVn-qQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<d> wrote in message news:444fa4b6_2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
If you are going to burn hydrogen, you should burn it in a fuel cell.
IMO
the only energy advantage of hydrogen is that it can be burned in a fuel
cell without fuel modification. If you are going to burn something in
an
ICE, there are better fuels. Good luck getting a car with a fuel cell,
getting the hydrogen, cramming enough into the car to get anywhere and
not
having an accident and incinerating yourself.

PV-H2 should pop up anytime and provide a number of links about H2.
Then
try wikipedia and finally do a google search. There are hundreds of
articles with good and bad information. Try to figure out which is
which.


Why do you consider a fuel cell to be advantageous?

Don W.




.

Relevant Pages