Re: Any alternatives for conventional gasoline?



Josh Hill wrote:

On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 06:57:18 -0700, Don Lancaster <don@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Give it up.

Induction ain't gonna happen because of fundamental economic and
engineering absurdities.

The former, perhaps. The latter appear to be figmentary.

You apparently haven't twigged that no 'useful power' can be supplied through anything more than
a minute air gap. This is why power transformers are wound on magnetic cores not air cores.

That'll require a vehicle to be stationary while being recharged. This is *utterly fundamental*
science.

Graham

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Any alternatives for conventional gasoline?
    ... a minute air gap. ... This is why power transformers are wound on magnetic cores not air cores. ... That'll require a vehicle to be stationary while being recharged. ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)
  • Re: Any alternatives for conventional gasoline?
    ... a minute air gap. ... This is why power transformers are wound on magnetic cores not air cores. ... That'll require a vehicle to be stationary while being recharged. ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)
  • Re: Any alternatives for conventional gasoline?
    ... a minute air gap. ... This is why power transformers are wound on magnetic cores not air cores. ... That'll require a vehicle to be stationary while being recharged. ... "We need an energy policy that encourages consumption" ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)
  • Re: Any alternatives for conventional gasoline?
    ... a minute air gap. ... This is why power transformers are wound on magnetic cores not air cores. ... That'll require a vehicle to be stationary while being recharged. ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)
Quantcast