Re: Summation of Dr Olah's interview on Methanol


"Josh Hill" <usereplyto@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:satcc29d6lgpncn6nplsiab5ontfsnkvu8@xxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:27:53 GMT, AZ Nomad <aznomad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 14:18:11 -0400, Josh Hill <usereplyto@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:38:27 GMT, AZ Nomad <aznomad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:07:07 -0400, Josh Hill <usereplyto@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Right -- hydrogen is completely non-polluting, which is its great
advantage.

1) you're ignoring NO2 emmissions
2) you're ignoring pollution from hydrogen generation.

You're right. I should have said when burned in fuel cells and when
the source is non-polluting.

Only when you find a H2 well. Until then, you have the polution at the
source
and twenty times what it would be otherwise due to the inefficiencies with
H2 generation, transport, and consumption.

Oh, for ***'s sake. The wind ain't polluting, the environmental
effects of wind generation are minor by comparison to other sources,
and as to your twenty times "figure," I can only suppose it's a
running count of the farts you emit as you type this uninformed tripe.

If you have wind power, why would you do something as silly as make hydrogen
with it?


K. Jones




Now here are some questions for for you: What kind of garbage mind can
transmute wind, probably the least polluting practical energy source
we have, and hydrogen, probably the least polluting practical energy
carrier, into dirty ones? What benighted planet did it originate on?
How did it get here? Is it susceptible to common bug sprays?

--
Josh

[Truly] I say to you, [...] angel [...] power will be able to see that
[...]
these to whom [...] holy generations [...]. After Jesus said this, he
departed.

- The Gospel of Judas


.

Loading