Re: Re: Stanley Meyer´s waterfuelcell research in germany

On 3 Aug 2006 10:41:50 -0700, knews4u2chew@xxxxxxxxx wrote:


Don Lancaster wrote:
knews4u2chew@xxxxxxxxx wrote:


Yes, what is in the archive is an original experimenter's post reposted
by JW, Ohannon, and me.

Whoopee.


The bottom line is this:

You either are or are not proposing a problem with Faraday's Law.

If you are not, then Meyer's credibility is clearly zero.
If you are, then your credibility is clearly zero.

End of story.

--
Many thanks,


The problem is, not one of the detractors here has ever done the
experiment.

And by your own admission, neither have you.

Seeing that Meyer's claims were in blatant violation of thermodynamic
laws, nobody with half a brain has bothered trying to replicate his
results. It's incumbent upon the people who believe and promote
Meyer's claims to replicate them and prove to the world that Meyer
wasn't a con man.

Notice Meyer died some 7 years ago and *still* nobody has bothered to
vindicate him. Lots of bluster from somebody who has admitted to
giving Meyer money, but still no working water fuel cell.

Your life is a waste. Give it up already.




.

Quantcast