Re: Free Energy


<hhc314@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1156606701.799648.174760@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mike, I believe you are overlooking a basic but critical point, which
is:

"Where does all that Free Energy eventually end up?"

The energy that does not accomplish physical work or is stored is
eventually dissipated in the form of heat.

The bottom line is that any unlimited source of free energy would
eventually fry the planet.

Harry C.



Mike McWilliams wrote:
Don Lancaster wrote:
Gary Grundy wrote:

Well is it possible?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060818/bs_afp/irelandscienceenergy


Finding a free energy device would be an unspeakably henious crime
against humanity. It would make Hiler look look Mother Teresa. As it
would promptly turn the Earth into a cinder. You better hope and pray
that this one (like the thousands that have gone before) is totally
bogus.

I'm only on board with you in this judgement as a temporary measure. The
abundance of free energy would enable humans to all have higher
standards of living, and enable us to do things like clean up some of
the messes we've made.

Ex. If you have a free energy source, it costs nothing to repair the
ozone layer.

Ex. If you have a free energy source, it costs nothing to scrub CO2 from
the atmosphere...

The list can go on.

But like I said I agree with you. People are bloodthirsty. So a caveat
on the free energy would be that it can only generate 30kW/h and only
one such device would be able to operate in a 25m radius.

This way you can't concentrate the energy like a nuclear weapon.


Fortunately, here is not the slightest doubt whatsoever that this is a
scam.

Exactly what type of scam (or its degree of cleverness or stupidity)
has
yet to be determined.

Their front end expenses are humongous.

Best present guess is it is a stunt to demonstrate their PR capability.

http://www.tinaja.com/glib/bashpseu.pdf


It is better that humans don't have unlimited energy, it forces us to
learn how to use resources efficiently... much as nature already has.

Would you say that geothermic energy fits that scenario? Wouldn't the inner
earth cool as the energy is transferred to the surface? Just a question.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Free Energy
    ... The bottom line is that any unlimited source of free energy would ... If you have a free energy source, it costs nothing to scrub CO2 from ... Exactly what type of scam has ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)
  • Re: Free Energy
    ... The bottom line is that any unlimited source of free energy would ... Mike McWilliams wrote: ... If you have a free energy source, it costs nothing to scrub CO2 from ... Exactly what type of scam has ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)
  • Re: Burning water
    ... whenever someone trots out another "free energy" sort of scam. ... real energy solution is nuclear power, but too many people reject it out ...
    (rec.motorcycles.harley)