Re: New Laws of Physics
- From: "K. Jones" <kjones@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:07:17 -0400
"Bill Ward" <bward@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:pan.2007.07.14.07.30.38.737622@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:07:04 -0700, hhc314 wrote:
On Jul 12, 7:57 pm, Don Lancaster <d...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
hhc...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:Don, just curious, have you ever heard of the use of gasoline on hay
smolders? Does it make sense?
Long ago, Harry, I heard a similar story from my father, but involving
smoldering cotton bales. Supposedly, water could not penetrate the bale
and displace the O2, while kerosene would snuff the fire without
difficulty.
I have no direct knowledge of how well it worked, but it seemed
non-controversial to others at the time. Later, I guessed the cotton may
have contained cottonseed oil, which would be lipophilic, and may not have
allowed water to wet it. I don't know whether anyone ever tried soapy
water.
Regards,
Bill Ward
Sort of. Fighting smouldering powder-river basin coal with water, is a
non-starter.
The stuff will float, and it just kinda kicks the sparking embers around
akin to water on an oil fire.
F-500 works much better on it, it's a typical water type extinguisher with a
"wetting agent", that facilitates the dust absorbing the water.
Just Google F-500 fire fighting or something similar.
K. Jones
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New Laws of Physics
- From: Don Lancaster
- Re: New Laws of Physics
- Prev by Date: Re: Beyond batteries: Storing power in a *** of paper
- Next by Date: Re: New Laws of Physics
- Previous by thread: Beyond batteries: Storing power in a *** of paper
- Next by thread: Re: New Laws of Physics
- Index(es):
Loading