Re: Stanley Meyer Water Fuel Cell

On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 10:18:35 -0700, knews4u2chew@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Sep 9, 9:38 am, u...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (User) wrote:
On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 08:44:50 -0700, knews4u2c...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Sep 9, 1:27 am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Meyer was found guilty of fraud after his Water Fuel
Cell was tested before an Ohio judge.

Lie.
It was demonstrated at a deposition where it was tampered with.

It was demonstrated at a deposition where it was found to be doing
conventional electrolysis.

Liar.
Meyer's cell is not, could not, and NEVER WILL BE ELECTROLYSIS.

And you say this because Meyer told you so. You yourelf have admitted
you lack the necessary scientific background to understand it. The
rest of us understand that Meyer wan't the man-god you hold him to be.
We understand and accept that he was fallible.

And he was fallible.

Meyer had to come up with a reason for this finding, so he claimed
sabotage.

No.
It's right in the deposition.
The Plaintiff's engineer introduced "white powder" to Meyer's cell
where upon IT CEASED TO FUNCTION.
ELECTROLYE FUCKS UP HIS PROCESS.

Funny how you can't point to any portion of the deposition supporting
this. You say "It's right in the deposition." Where.

Again, you say "It's right in the deposition.". Where?

Extremely funny is that the deposition, while recorded on tape, was
never transcribed to text. If there was any question whatsoever as to
the validity of the proceedings, the tapes would have been
transcribed. He claimed all sorts of problems with the trial. It's
well known Meyer took in a large sum of money with this "research".
Yet he never spent the few thousand dollars to have the tapes
transcribed to support his sabotage and conflict of interest claims?
Strange.

Since Meyer never had any legitimate gripe with the proceedings, he
never had the tapes transcribed. All his problems with sabotage and
conflict of interest cropped up years later as he refined his story.

Note that he often claimed he was going to appeal, yet he never did.
Why do you supppose that is?

Funny how sabotage would cause this magical cell simply to
revert to conventional electrolysis.

No LIAR.
It ceased to function because it is not dependent on electrolyte to
function.
THE MORE PURE THE WATER THE BETTER HIS CELL WORKS.

Because Meyer told you so. Keep in mind Meyer was found guilty of
fraud, do what he told you might not be compleely accurate.

Again, it's quite funny that this magical water fuel cell designed o
separate "natural water" in a magical and low-energy manner, would
"cease to function" by reverting to conventional electrolysis when
sabotaged with a mysterious white powder.

It is rare for an inventor to
be prosecuted for an invention that does not work, but Meyer's problem
was that he had been selling "dealerships", offering investors the
"right to do business'' in Water Fuel Cell technology. Meyer refused
to allow anyone else to measure his device.

Lie.
It was measured by Members of the Royal Institute of Navel Architects.

It was never "measured by Members of the Royal Institute of Navel
Architects".

Did you go England with him and his cell?

No. But I know of Admiral Anthony Griffin, and I know his background,
and his accomplishments. His latter years were truly heartbreaking.

Meyer *demonstrated* it to Admiral Tony Griffin, who was
a one-time president of the Royal Institute of Naval Architects.

And he had more credentialed associates than you can count.
He had the resources of years at the Institute.

He also suffered from Alzheimers at that point.

Griffin was an amazing man in his time. It's sad that Meyer took
advantage of him in his waning years.

Griffin was retired at the time and his brain had turned to mush.

Ad hominem noted.

Do you deny that Admiral Anthony Griffin was suffering from Alzheimers
when he got involvd with Meter?

Meyer's pitch had him fooled, and Griffin spent several years trying
to convince the British establishment that Meyer was real. He became
laughingstock of the British establishment.

Sure.
Liar.

Yes.

Dennis Lee invested in
him.

Another BLATANT LIE.

He died in early 1998.Stanley Meyers gets locked up for phony
water powered cars-

Meyer was never even given any Cease and Desist orders and was FINED
1, THAT'S ONE, DOLLAR for his "gross egregious fraud."

What a joke. The judge was related to the Plaintiff and his expert
witnesses were ignored.

That would have been grounds to have the verdict set aside without
question. It never happened. Same with the sabotage. It never
happened.

Liar.

So, you believe that blatant conflict of interest wouldn't have been
enough to get the verdict overthrown? For somebody who screams that
the American judicial system is patently corrupt, you show an amazing
ignorance of how it operates.



.