Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Willie.Mookie@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 23:10:26 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 7, 1:55 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Dec 6, 8:26 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
IDIOT.
Low cost hydrogen isn't here, never mind 'to stay'.
I am writing contracts today with folks to buy hydrogen.
Writing contracts is NOT the same as *making* hydrogen.
Please seehttp://www.usoal.com
The cost is $800
Cost per WHAT ?
metric ton
- which is lower cost than humanity now pays for
carbon fuels on a heat value basis.
Without a 'per what', the figure is entirely meaningless.
Graham
Obviously, per metric ton. You've read what I've written so you're
being an idiot yourself. Clearly, I said in my original post of
December 6, which you responded to on December 6 that 3.34 billion
metric tons of hydrogen each year would displace all of humanity's
carbon needs and that at $800 per metric ton it would cost less than
the $4 trillion humanity is now spending on carbon each year.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- References:
- Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Willie . Mookie
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Willie . Mookie
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Eeyore
- Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- Prev by Date: Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- Next by Date: Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- Previous by thread: Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- Next by thread: Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|