Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay

On Dec 8, 12:04 am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

IDIOT.

Low cost hydrogen isn't here, never mind 'to stay'.

I am writing contracts today with folks to buy hydrogen.

Writing contracts is NOT the same as *making* hydrogen.

Please seehttp://www.usoal.com

The cost is $800

Cost per WHAT ?

metric ton

- which is lower cost than humanity now pays for
carbon fuels on a heat value basis.

Without a 'per what', the figure is entirely meaningless.

Graham

Obviously, per metric ton.

Not obvious at all. Americans use all manner of weird measures like BTUs.
It might have been per megabushel for all I know.

Why not US tons btw since you're intending to sell in the USA.?

I supported Carter's move toward SI units back in the day, and I've
stuck with SI units ever since. I mean, Coca Cola sells 2 liter
bottles of Coke in the US. lol.

When you buy hydrogen from me sweetie, it'll in in metric tons.

How many tons of *electrolytically manufactured* hydrogen have you sold to
date ?

$24 billion worth. 1/3 of it will be used to upgrade lower rank
fuels, 2/3 will be burned directly.

Graham!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

.