Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Willie.Mookie@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:19:15 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 9, 8:20 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
How many tons of *electrolytically manufactured* hydrogen have you sold to
date ?
$24 billion worth. 1/3 of it will be used to upgrade lower rank
fuels, 2/3 will be burned directly.
And when will you deliver these 30 million tons ?
30 billion you mean
No, I meant 30 millon tons. As in $24 bn/ $800 per ton.
- these are 40 year contracts with first deliveries in 2011.
OK. Good luck with that.
Graham
Graham, you were right, it was the flu talking! lol. The whole
world needs 3.34 billion tons, so 30 billion tons would be 10 years
supply for the whole world. Thanks for pointing that out.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- References:
- Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Willie . Mookie
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Willie . Mookie
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Willie . Mookie
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Willie . Mookie
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Willie . Mookie
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Eeyore
- Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- Prev by Date: Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- Next by Date: Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- Previous by thread: Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- Next by thread: Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|