Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Monkey Clumps <spacebrain71@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 06:17:27 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 12, 8:18 pm, Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Dec 13, 1:19 am, Monkey Clumps <spacebrai...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<SNIP>
Thanks for the explanations. Once again, it sounds like you have all
of the angles thought out. Regarding the typhoon impact question, I
had not realized your PV device was essentially embedded flush into
the ground. I guess I imagined a bunch of devices on stands that
would be blown away like dried leaves. If you are embedded, as you
pointed out, the wind becomes a non-issue but water and mud a problem
in a deluge, so it makes sense that you are concentrating on drainage.
For what its worth, I'm pretty impressed by what you are describing.
It sounds like a real business plan and real technology that actually
has a good chance of working, unlike most of the kooky BS that floats
around usenet. It sounds like things are far enough along that you
have actually demonstrated to the people that matter that it *will*
work. I am amazed and appreciative that you would share so much info
with a usenet audience. Five or ten years from now we may be reading
about you in Business Week rather than usenet.
Two final questions. Do you have any plans in the works to implement
this technology in the US? Secondly, on the issue of automotive
technology, where do you think things will go? For the interim, your
system could generate gasoline from the abundant coal we have in this
county. Of course the carbon in the coal will still be released, but
by combining it with hydrogen at least we get more energy out of it
than if it was just burned as coal in an electric power plant. If
people like you can actually provide hydrogen in an environmentally
friendly and economically competitive manner, it seems like using
hydrogen directly as automotive fuel could be a possibility. Of
course the system you describe produces hydrogen gas , I am not sure
if the energy required to liquefy it would make it uncompetitive with
fossil fuels. Then there is also the model that the power plants
start burning the hydrogen and we go to electric "plug-in" car,
provided the battery technology can get there. Your thoughts?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Willie . Mookie
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- References:
- Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Willie . Mookie
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Willie . Mookie
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Willie . Mookie
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Willie . Mookie
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Willie . Mookie
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Willie . Mookie
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Monkey Clumps
- Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- From: Willie . Mookie
- Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- Prev by Date: Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- Next by Date: Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- Previous by thread: Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- Next by thread: Re: Low Cost Hydrogen is here to stay
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|