Re: Hydrogen Powered Supersonic Concorde Replacement
- From: jgraber@xxxxxx
- Date: 18 Dec 2007 22:40:20 -0600
Willie.Mookie@xxxxxxxxx writes:
....
would require 10 aircraft be constructed. WIth two spares used as
training and test aircraft, that's 12 aircraft. At $200 million per
aircraft, this is a program cost of $2.4 billion. With 12,000 flight
cycles per aircraft, this is a total of 120,000 flight cycles for the
10 operating aircraft. With 450 passenger seats at 75% loading - 338
passengers per flight. 40.56 million trips per fleet. At 2 flight
cycles per aircraft per day - that's 12 year life span. At $450 per
flight that's a $300 profit per trip - or $12.2 billion profit for the
fleet. The flight consumes 7.44 million tonnes of hydrogen over their
lives.
Increasing costs to $750 per flight and assuming a loading factor of
85% - dramatically increases profits 226% to $27.7 billion over the
life cycle of the fleet!
If development costs can be kept to $10B that Boeing is variously
reported to have spent to develop the 777, the price of the 10 aircraft
jump from $200M to $1200M. How does that affect the business plan?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hydrogen Powered Supersonic Concorde Replacement
- From: Willie . Mookie
- Re: Hydrogen Powered Supersonic Concorde Replacement
- From: Willie . Mookie
- Re: Hydrogen Powered Supersonic Concorde Replacement
- From: Willie . Mookie
- Re: Hydrogen Powered Supersonic Concorde Replacement
- Prev by Date: Re: Hydrogen Cars, Trucks, and Buses Are the Answer Indeed
- Next by Date: Re: Hydrogen Cars, Trucks, and Buses Are the Answer Indeed
- Previous by thread: Honda's solar cell production plant
- Next by thread: Re: Hydrogen Powered Supersonic Concorde Replacement
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading