Re: Hydrogen Powered Supersonic Concorde Replacement
- From: BradGuth <bradguth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 11:29:49 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 22, 1:01 am, William Mook <william.m...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Dec 21, 7:43 am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Clearly, Boeing already has instituted a 12 meter stretch in their
existing 747 line.
No they DAMN WELL HAVEN'T !
It's a 5.6 metre stretch.
YOU CAN'T EVEN GET BASIC FACTS RIGHT !
Graham
Um, here are the numbers I get, from Boeing's website;
747-400 is 64.4 m in length
http://www.boeing.com/commercial/747family/747tech.swf
IT SAYS 70.7 m !
LIAR.
As I said above ....
YOU CAN'T EVEN GET BASIC FACTS RIGHT !
Graham- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Again, I will say for the 100th time - that I mistook the wing span
for the length - since I didn't have my reading glasses on when I
looked it up. I will say this stems from me giving your objections
ALL the attention they deserve! lol. You fruitcake.
Eeyore's only function in life is to fined as little as one typo or
reading mistake in order to disqualify all thousand other R&D facts
that are 100% true. Pretty much mindset acting just like yourself.
For the task of safely delivering clean energy into our environment,
and since your methods are so often limited as to using solar PVs, it
seems that you are being just like all the other bigots of Usenet,
such as being so deathly afraid of other clean energy terrestrial
alternatives or even for establishing anything within the moon's L1
(somewhat Clarke Station or Boeing Oasis like). It's as though you
either haven't an honest clue about the greater technological worth of
using the moon's L1, or that your true intentions are merely those of
a typical rusemaster that's essentially a lose cannon that's firing
off rounds all over the place, and especially tossing flak at any
honest thought, notion or idea that isn't of yours or that might
involve an actual speck of remorse.
I for one actually believe in allowing and/or promoting a mostly
hydrogen basis of clean energy (including h2o2) to emerge, though not
as always limited by that of a purely hydrogen usage where the
required volume and complexity of safely accommodating such LH2 as
stored energy is simply getting in the way of hauling freight and
passengers. BTW, a purely electric driven turboprop aircraft as
operating from the compact nature of an h2o2/aluminum battery or fuel-
cell isn't such a bad idea, although a one-cycle ICE hybrid that's
burning the likes of h2o2/c12h26 or h2o2/synfuel+atmosphere at sub-
orbital scramjet speeds is perhaps even better.
Actually, a placement of your PV stuff at Earth's L1 could also become
utilized if your vast array of such efficient solar PVs were at least
a forth to nearly half the disk area of our moon, as that alone would
moderate those bad sorts of solar IR photons that's getting through as
to only further warming up our moon and AGW forced environment, while
allowing the visible spectrum or those violet or near-blue photons via
your laser cannon as getting efficiently beamed back to all of those
Mook efficient PV farms of Earth's energy receiving stations.
BTW, I once had a partner or close associate within the private
boating world of taking care of our mutual yachting clients, however
he too was always right no matters what, even after having set things
on fire, having allowed his clients at multiple times as having dead
batteries and countless other energy related and systems deficiencies
of the most basic requirements that often became costly and even at
times somewhat life threatening, though somehow having managed to not
get his clients or their guest killed off. His all-knowing standards
were simply much like those conditional laws of physics and of
excluding the best available science of whatever and however many such
things should function, as though pretty much regardless of the
consequences and thus acting almost exactly like yourself.
You'd think with such a personal archive of third or forth hand
information at your disposal, that as such you'd have become over-
qualified as a viable team R&D person, whereas instead you are a self
made bigot of the 3rd or 4th hand all-knowing kind (very much Third
Reich like), as to whatever anyone might interpret or much less
suggest is always a bad or insurmountable problem to your out-of-
context mindset way of traumatising each and everything that's not of
your idea to start with. I suppose the likes of Ted Kazinsky, Hitler,
of most devout Zionists and our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) have
had to operate in pretty much the same bullish(all or nothing) way,
without reguard for those pesky future consequences.
That's actually a darn good thing for the rest of us to realize,
especially because of my 50/50 plan of public support on behalf of
promoting such worthy R&D need not waste a hard earned dime on
anything proposed by the global energy domination likes of lord Mook.
Therefore, you and Eeyore need to sleep on it together, as a mutual
fornacating team effort as to how each of you nut bags are going to
accomplish the most collateral damage and carnage of the innocent
before we manage to use up or overbook the dregs of affordable fossil
and yellowcake energy on Earth.
- Brad Guth -
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hydrogen Powered Supersonic Concorde Replacement
- From: Willie . Mookie
- Re: Hydrogen Powered Supersonic Concorde Replacement
- References:
- Re: Hydrogen Powered Supersonic Concorde Replacement
- From: jgraber
- Re: Hydrogen Powered Supersonic Concorde Replacement
- From: Willie . Mookie
- Re: Hydrogen Powered Supersonic Concorde Replacement
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Hydrogen Powered Supersonic Concorde Replacement
- From: Al G
- Re: Hydrogen Powered Supersonic Concorde Replacement
- From: Willie . Mookie
- Re: Hydrogen Powered Supersonic Concorde Replacement
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Hydrogen Powered Supersonic Concorde Replacement
- From: Willie . Mookie
- Re: Hydrogen Powered Supersonic Concorde Replacement
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Hydrogen Powered Supersonic Concorde Replacement
- From: Willie . Mookie
- Re: Hydrogen Powered Supersonic Concorde Replacement
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Hydrogen Powered Supersonic Concorde Replacement
- From: William Mook
- Re: Hydrogen Powered Supersonic Concorde Replacement
- Prev by Date: Re: Question for William Mook
- Next by Date: Re: Hydrogen Powered Supersonic Concorde Replacement
- Previous by thread: Re: Hydrogen Powered Supersonic Concorde Replacement
- Next by thread: Re: Hydrogen Powered Supersonic Concorde Replacement
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|