Re: Alternatives to Lens Arrays


<Willie.Mookie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:bdfea948-0aa5-4936-9157-ae6b2cac9140@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Snip....

That wasn't part of this conversation. Its proceeding nicely. The
point is, there's 400,000 acres at the new place and its got a lot of
sun. Covering it with the PET lens arrays will produce 306 GW peak at
$0.07 per peak watt. Covering it with 44,000 of the other
concentrators I've described produces 1.1 TW peak at $0.04 per peak
watt. (I'm not going to be covering it with ANYTHING any time soon,
just test systems on a larger scale)

Cut.......

Thanks, Well, it's been like pulling teeth, but I finally got it out of you.
I hope all of the other posters see what you wrote above. "I'm not going to
be covering it with ANYTHING any time soon."... No ***!

Yep, just as Eeyore and others have been saying. Watch closely, at no time
do my fingers leave my hand!...Enough said.

Bye



.