Re: Hydrostar generator
- From: Damon Hill <damon1SIX1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2008 12:46:35 -0600
Chuck <chuckknight@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:496f5abe-800f-4568-9964-
fbd93f282bee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Strangely, though, one of their claims actually caught my attention.
The injection of the hydrogen into the combustion chamber, and a
subsequent increase in gas mileage.
The only glimmer of hope in this assumption is that the injection of
some hydrogen might somehow modify the combustion process, but it's
very doubtful any additional energy realized will offset the losses
to any meaningful degree. Reality check: if it were valid, it'd
already have been done on a large scale.
As pointed out elsewhere, your basic assumptions are in error.
--Damon Thermodynamics is one MEAN bitch and she won't let you go.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hydrostar generator
- From: Chuck
- Re: Hydrostar generator
- References:
- Hydrostar generator
- From: Chuck
- Hydrostar generator
- Prev by Date: Re: Hydrostar generator
- Next by Date: Re: Hydrostar generator
- Previous by thread: Re: Hydrostar generator
- Next by thread: Re: Hydrostar generator
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|