Re: H2 burner

On May 23, 5:51 pm, Fred Kasner <fkas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jinker wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2008 17:03:02 -0500, Fred Kasner wrote:

Better men than you have not forced me to back pedal on matters of
science.

I have nothing to do with it, but you have already backpedaled the length
of a football field by going from addressing Mook as 'Fool!' and claiming
that 'my genes are worth more than your genes', and 'my father was more
intelligent than your father', to addressing what you consider his errors
in a sober, respectful way, as you just did in a post about the ground
water, the cost of electrolysis, etc.

It's good to see that you have been chastened, even if you can't admit it.

My background in electrical engineering (had most of the
courses in EE finished while in military and then returned to my desired
subject physical chemistry and earned my Ph.D. in that area.) and
chemistry make me something that does not go by the name "usenet
expert". FK

'Arrogant fool' would fit the bill.

Rather amusing that I am first told that I am a "usenet expert" which
really means no expert at all. Then when I produce the evidence that I
am expert in some areas academically I am then told I am arrogant. In
other words you have no evidence for your assertion and so you merely
dress it up with further invective. Now who is clearly the fool? Your
opinion, BTW, is worth nothing as demonstrated by your continued
assertions without evidence.
FK- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Dude, you may take great pride in recounting for all of us your
academic history, but please note the context. Namely, I pointed out
that your discussion of the dangers of burning hydrogen were bogus.
BOGUS. While it is true that hydrogen has the POTENTIAL to be highly
explosive, it is equally true that catalytic burners have been around
for a long time that can safely and reliably burn hydrogen for stoves,
heaters and other similar applications.

Now, when someone points this out to you, what is your response?

Argue from authority,denigrate the source, and generally be an
***.

Which despite your purported academic attainments mark you off as an
internet expert of no account since you obviously cannot carry on a
rational argument.

The answer for you Bongo is to admit that catalytic burners of the
type I pointed to can indeed be used safely even with hydrogen - since
there is no open flame - and move on.

You seem incapable of doing this,which also indicates that you are of
substandard intelligence again despite your purported academic
attainments.

Which just goes to show, that PhDs like Driver's Licenses should be re-
tested and re-issued every three to five years based on a variety of
factors - and take away the PhDs from the assholes who can't carry on
a logical discussion based on facts not authority.


.

Quantcast