Re: Stanley Meyer's water auto [1980]
- From: Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 09:50:33 +0100
Bret wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2008 19:47:31 +0100, Eeyore wrote:
Spaceman wrote:
"Eeyore" wrote
None of that will produce enough electrical energy to electrolyse water
into hydrogen to keep the engine running. It's an *ENERGY NEGATIVE*
process. Note the engine's waste heat from the exhaust and cooling system
for example. This is LOST ENERGY.
Lost energy that apparently you will never figure out
how to extract some sort of way.
Because you can't 'some sort of way' you bloody moron.
As soon as I get that killfile re-installed, thank God i won't be seeing any
more of your fabulously ignorant nonsense.
People as stupid as you really make me worry about the fate of the human race.
Stop responding to the TROLL , no-one is as stupid as he appears.
'JW' is.
Graham
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Stanley Meyer's water auto [1980]
- From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Stanley Meyer's water auto [1980]
- References:
- Re: Stanley Meyer's water auto [1980]
- From: Bret
- Re: Stanley Meyer's water auto [1980]
- Prev by Date: Re: Next silly spaceman question
- Next by Date: Re: Stanley Meyer's water auto [1980]
- Previous by thread: Re: Stanley Meyer's water auto [1980]
- Next by thread: Re: Stanley Meyer's water auto [1980]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|