Re: H2 burner

On Jun 10, 2:38 am, DB <a...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Williamknowsbest wrote:
On Jun 7, 1:32 am, DB <a...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Williamknowsbest wrote:
On Jun 6, 10:20 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Williamknowsbest wrote:
Harry
While we agree on the importance of marginal value we disagree on the
marginal value of hydrogen and its aafety.  Hydrogen is perfectly safe
as a fuel if handled properly.   Hydrogen using a sufficiently low
cost solar power system may be made available at costs competitive
with existing fuels.
A ton of hydrogen has the same heat value of 6.2 tons of coal.
And the volume of these at STP is ?
Graham
That is a singularly dumbass question.
<snip lecture>

Interesting that you snip all the relevant data...

No, your dumb ass rant.

A recounting of our fossil fuel usage and an calculation of how much
hydrogen is needed to replace it, along with a plan to transition
using lesser amounts of hydrogen is not a 'rant'. Its a discussion
of our energy options. On the other hand, statements that you make,
such as, "we're screwed" could properly be classified as a rant since
it is your feeling not backed up by any sort of logic, discussion, or
reference.

Show the photos of your billion dollar plant

In Indonesia there are two facilities underway and they're costing
around $7 billion each.

Anyone who visits my web site and fills out the contact information
may request information including such photos.

http://www.usoal.com

or
shove it.-

*** you too sweetheart.


.