Re: H2 burner

On Jun 11, 9:55 am, Williamknowsbest <William.M...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 11, 12:02 am, "Spaceman" <space...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

"Williamknowsbest" <William.M...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:ebe75388-e9d6-466f-a157-e0c8a403b07e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Anyone who visits my web site and fills out the contact information
may request information including such photos.
http://www.usoal.com

Nice business.
Must be raking in money.
:)

--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman

Its highly leveraged at present - so, like Churchill I find I must
rely on allies I don't particularly trust or like! lol. But we will
prevail, that's for sure.

Hey William, have you seen this paper?

http://www.hionsolar.com/n-hion96.htm

They describe a direct-thermal solar to hydrogen process where they
achieved 1 to 2% efficiency. The interesting part was the section
near the end talking about efficiencies of various methods.
Apparently, the solar-to-hydrogen efficiency obtained using silicon
photovoltaic cells and an alkaline electrolyzer is about 6%. The
conversion efficiency for a solar dish Stirling generator combined
with an alkaline electrolyzer is 19%. The long term solar-to-hydrogen
efficiency goal established by the National Renewable Energy
Laboratory is 25%.

Now you come along and say you can achieve 55% thermodynamic
efficiency with a device that is relatively inexpensive to boot. Your
efficiency is more than double the long term goal. This seems like a
huge breakthrough. As long as you have your designs protected by
patents, why don't you publish some results in a peer-reviewed
journal? You say you don't like the allies you have to rely on. If
this breakthrough is real you should be sharing the news of it with
the world. People and politicians are hungry for this sort of
technical breakthrough. If you want allies you need to to let people
know and convince them that this is real. A usenet newsgroup is
probably not the most efficient forum to spread the word.
.