Re: beanstalks (was Re: Metallic hydrogen ...)
From: Michael Varney (varney_at_colorado_no_spam.edu)
Date: 06/07/04
- Next message: me_at_privacy.com: "Re: Could a 200 year engine solve today's oil crisis?"
- Previous message: Hater of the Second Law of Thermodynamics: "Help! I hate 2LT!"
- In reply to: Christopher M. Jones: "Re: beanstalks (was Re: Metallic hydrogen ...)"
- Next in thread: George William Herbert: "Re: beanstalks (was Re: Metallic hydrogen ...)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 21:10:35 -0600
"Christopher M. Jones" <marmiteNOTSPAM@dualboot.net> wrote in message
news:V_Pwc.890$T46.61533@news.uswest.net...
> Michael Varney wrote:
> > "Joe Strout" <joe@strout.net> wrote in message
> > news:joe-804766.20210706062004@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> >
> >>In article <40C3BCDF.A0B730E7@hate.spam.net>,
> >> Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote:
> >>>How do you gits plan to run your elevator, if and when? You cannot
> >>>string an electrical conductor along the beanstalk - every time the
> >>>magnetosphere burped you'd roman candle. Gonna use... rockets?
> >>
> >>If this was an attempt to hide your ignorance behind insults and
> >>name-calling, it failed. Your ignorance is all too clear.
> >
> > *smirk*
> >
> > It is cute when losers like yourself think that they know enough physics
to
> > propose such projects. LOL!
>
> A smirk is often an unsuitable replacement for reasoned
> debate. To each his own I suppose.
The response was tailored to the OP. QED.
- Next message: me_at_privacy.com: "Re: Could a 200 year engine solve today's oil crisis?"
- Previous message: Hater of the Second Law of Thermodynamics: "Help! I hate 2LT!"
- In reply to: Christopher M. Jones: "Re: beanstalks (was Re: Metallic hydrogen ...)"
- Next in thread: George William Herbert: "Re: beanstalks (was Re: Metallic hydrogen ...)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
