Re: Is Athabasca a unique formation?
From: quibbler (quibbler247_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 06/14/04
- Next message: william mook: "Re: I'm hearing bad things about breeder reactors"
- Previous message: G. R. L. Cowan: "Re: Mook's quote about nuclear being a "low grade heat". Is it true?"
- In reply to: Eric Gisin: "Re: Is Athabasca a unique formation?"
- Next in thread: Cyril: "Re: Is Athabasca a unique formation?"
- Reply: Cyril: "Re: Is Athabasca a unique formation?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 06:22:09 -0600
In article <caic4j0vi0@enews4.newsguy.com>, ericgisin@graffiti.net
says...
> Alberta and Siberia both have oil sands (bitumen).
>
> Anyone know why Russia's are not being developed? Both have the same cold
> climate, but alberta has an existing oil and gas infrastructure.
I suspect it's because Alberta is much closer to the USA. Canada is our
largest trading partner, Bill O'Reilly's ignorance notwithstanding.
--
Quibbler (quibbler247atyahoo.com)
"It is fashionable to wax apocalyptic about the
threat to humanity posed by the AIDS virus, 'mad cow'
disease, and many others, but I think a case can be
made that faith is one of the world's great evils,
comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to
eradicate." -- Richard Dawkins
- Next message: william mook: "Re: I'm hearing bad things about breeder reactors"
- Previous message: G. R. L. Cowan: "Re: Mook's quote about nuclear being a "low grade heat". Is it true?"
- In reply to: Eric Gisin: "Re: Is Athabasca a unique formation?"
- Next in thread: Cyril: "Re: Is Athabasca a unique formation?"
- Reply: Cyril: "Re: Is Athabasca a unique formation?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|