Re: Danfoth/Meyer Sketch

From: If I told U I'd have 2 kill U (knews4u2chew_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 08/12/04 

Date: 11 Aug 2004 22:07:02 -0700

fkasner <fkasner@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:<x0TRc.4386$u_4.1057@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com>...
> If I told U I'd have 2 kill U wrote:
> > bward@ix.netcom.com (Bill Ward) wrote in message news:<410e6b4c.4915418@news.west.earthlink.net>...
> >
> >>On 2 Aug 2004 03:38:01 -0700, knews4u2chew@yahoo.com (If I
> >>told U I'd have 2 kill U) wrote:
> >>
> >><snip prior posts>
> >>
> >>>The fact IS is that you, Bill Ward, and your cronies have no idea of
> >>>how Meyer's circuit works.
> >>>The thread speaks for itself. You "experts" wanted to ignore half of
> >>>his circuit along with the function of the flyback transformer.
> >>>Great science.
> >>
> >>JW, I'm surprised you would bring up that thread.
> >
> >
> > You assume I am JW with no knowledge what so ever that I even know
> > him.
> > Is this more of how you practice science?
> >
> >
> >>I believe
> >>it does speak for itself, but I don't think it helps your
> >>case at all. I spent a fair chunk of time and patience back
> >>then trying to make Hannon and you understand why the
> >>circuit can't work as claimed.
> >>
> >>It still won't work, for the same reasons. Give it a rest
> >>and quit embarassing yourself.
> >>
> >>Learn some basic science - it's not that hard, and would be
> >>a whole lot more productive use of your time.
> >>
> >>
> >>Regards,
> >>
> >>Bill Ward
> >
> >
> > Like it or not Mr. Ward the circuit works as described by Meyer and
> > other experimenters and testers.
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&group=sci.energy.hydrogen&selm=36caa37d.0407262146.48e8675e%40posting.google.com
>
> What the poor Junior Dummy fails to understand is that he carries a
> fingerprint called literary style. This, since he failed to change it,
> was a positive identification of him. That and because he follows the
> same idiocy of hiding behind a pseudonym as he did when he went by the
> initials JW. We waited a long time to identify him as the well known
> Junior Dummy. But as the evidence accumulated it becams quite clear who
> he is. Go away fool. You only embarass yourself by repeating the same
> set of specious claims that you ran past here previously. When and if
> your return remember to change your literary style and change the form
> of the arguments you employ to promote the Meyer scam.
> FK

Speculation noted.

Just what "Meyer scam" am I "promoting."

Meyer get's nothing from me or the understanding of his work by
serious researchers and experimenters.

As more and more experimenters prove it to themselves we will all be
the better for it.
Meyer is dead, remember?

I see JW had a nice moniker for you too "King Dummy."

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Danfoth/Meyer Sketch
    ... > Junior Dummy. ... > your return remember to change your literary style and change the form ... > of the arguments you employ to promote the Meyer scam. ... serious researchers and experimenters. ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)
  • Re: Meyer Circuit Experiment
    ... >>would read true rms. ... > One of these days one of the numerous successful experimenters besides ... If we needed any proof via literary style that this is the Junior Dummy ... profane rage at the scientists in this NG. ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)
Loading