Re: E <=> MC^2 generally ...and also inside living things!
From: AA Institute (abdul.ahad_at_ntlworld.com)
Date: 08/12/04
- Next message: Karl Johanson: "Re: King Tut's Nukes (back by popular demand)"
- Previous message: AA Institute: "Re: E <=> MC^2 generally ...and also inside living things!"
- In reply to: Harry Conover: "Re: E <=> MC^2 generally ...and also inside living things!"
- Next in thread: Harry Conover: "Re: E <=> MC^2 generally ...and also inside living things!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 12 Aug 2004 09:23:11 -0700
hhc314@yahoo.com (Harry Conover) wrote in message news:<7ce4e226.0408111047.704df886@posting.google.com>...
>
> In generaly, no net mass change has ever been observed in any chemical
> reaction.
>
May be so, but in my micro-scale "missile" launch program, I would
guess the rocket accelerates faster toward the upper end of its flight
trajectory, as the mass is reduced through expended fuel in the intial
boost:-
http://uk.geocities.com/aa_spaceagent/ascent4.html
AA Institute
--------------------------------------
http://uk.geocities.com/aa_spaceagent
--------------------------------------
- Next message: Karl Johanson: "Re: King Tut's Nukes (back by popular demand)"
- Previous message: AA Institute: "Re: E <=> MC^2 generally ...and also inside living things!"
- In reply to: Harry Conover: "Re: E <=> MC^2 generally ...and also inside living things!"
- Next in thread: Harry Conover: "Re: E <=> MC^2 generally ...and also inside living things!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
