Re: knocking wind
From: Al Smith (ecarecar_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 08/29/04
- Next message: Steve Spence: "Re: Why BioDiesel and Not Hydrogen Cars..."
- Previous message: Mike Walsh: "Re: SOLAR-POWERED ROCKET"
- In reply to: Dan Bloomquist: "knocking wind"
- Next in thread: Dan Bloomquist: "Re: knocking wind"
- Reply: Dan Bloomquist: "Re: knocking wind"
- Reply: Don Lancaster: "Re: knocking wind"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 19:57:48 -0400
"Dan Bloomquist" <EXTRApublic20@lakeweb.com> wrote in message
news:413152D8.3000907@lakeweb.com...
>
> It seems this has to be beat to death over and over. Someone brings up
> wind and the _same_ folks come out of the woodwork waving their hands.
>
> Why is it so hard to just compare simple numbers?
>
> If the wind industry didn't have the numbers, I'd be saying it just like
> I do about the solar industry. Solar is too expensive to compete with
> fossils. That is obvious for anyone that bothered to do a little math.
> On the other hand, some folks don't want to 'bother to do the math'
> where it comes to wind. These groups start with sci. I find it
> surprising just how few of the posters here don't just 'do the math',
> apply objectivity, and quit making it a personal 'feeling' about what
> should and shouldn't be. No wonder this, (USA), county doesn't have a
> decent nuclear program. It is the same stupid ignorance all over again.
>
> Best, Dan.
>
Cool, Dan. I am prepared to believe.
Obviously, you have "done the math." Show us "the math."
- Next message: Steve Spence: "Re: Why BioDiesel and Not Hydrogen Cars..."
- Previous message: Mike Walsh: "Re: SOLAR-POWERED ROCKET"
- In reply to: Dan Bloomquist: "knocking wind"
- Next in thread: Dan Bloomquist: "Re: knocking wind"
- Reply: Dan Bloomquist: "Re: knocking wind"
- Reply: Don Lancaster: "Re: knocking wind"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
