Re: knocking wind
From: Dan Bloomquist (EXTRApublic20_at_lakeweb.com)
Date: 08/30/04
- Previous message: donald j haarmann: "Re: BIODIESEL"
- In reply to: Al Smith: "Re: knocking wind"
- Next in thread: Al Smith: "Re: knocking wind"
- Reply: Al Smith: "Re: knocking wind"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 00:58:46 GMT
Al Smith wrote:
> "Dan Bloomquist" <EXTRApublic20@lakeweb.com> wrote in message
> news:413152D8.3000907@lakeweb.com...
>
>>It seems this has to be beat to death over and over. Someone brings up
>>wind and the _same_ folks come out of the woodwork waving their hands.
>>
>>Why is it so hard to just compare simple numbers?
>>
>>If the wind industry didn't have the numbers, I'd be saying it just like
>>I do about the solar industry. Solar is too expensive to compete with
>>fossils. That is obvious for anyone that bothered to do a little math.
>>On the other hand, some folks don't want to 'bother to do the math'
>>where it comes to wind. These groups start with sci. I find it
>>surprising just how few of the posters here don't just 'do the math',
>>apply objectivity, and quit making it a personal 'feeling' about what
>>should and shouldn't be. No wonder this, (USA), county doesn't have a
>>decent nuclear program. It is the same stupid ignorance all over again.
>>
>>Best, Dan.
>>
>
>
> Cool, Dan. I am prepared to believe.
Don't. Be critical, but do so objectively. The point of my post is that
it should not be about believing.
>
> Obviously, you have "done the math." Show us "the math."
http://www.capelightcompact.org/pdfs/FIN_WIND-NATURAL_GAS_REPORT.pdf
Best, Dan.
-- http://lakeweb.net http://ReserveAnalyst.com No EXTRA stuff for email.
- Previous message: donald j haarmann: "Re: BIODIESEL"
- In reply to: Al Smith: "Re: knocking wind"
- Next in thread: Al Smith: "Re: knocking wind"
- Reply: Al Smith: "Re: knocking wind"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
