Re: knocking wind
From: Don Lancaster (don_at_tinaja.com)
Date: 08/30/04
- Next message: If I told U I'd have 2 kill U: "Those Darn Ruskies"
- Previous message: Dan Bloomquist: "Re: knocking wind"
- In reply to: Al Smith: "Re: knocking wind"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 18:38:09 -0700
Al Smith wrote:
>
> "Dan Bloomquist" <EXTRApublic20@lakeweb.com> wrote in message
> news:413152D8.3000907@lakeweb.com...
> >
> > It seems this has to be beat to death over and over. Someone brings up
> > wind and the _same_ folks come out of the woodwork waving their hands.
> >
> > Why is it so hard to just compare simple numbers?
> >
> > If the wind industry didn't have the numbers, I'd be saying it just like
> > I do about the solar industry. Solar is too expensive to compete with
> > fossils. That is obvious for anyone that bothered to do a little math.
> > On the other hand, some folks don't want to 'bother to do the math'
> > where it comes to wind. These groups start with sci. I find it
> > surprising just how few of the posters here don't just 'do the math',
> > apply objectivity, and quit making it a personal 'feeling' about what
> > should and shouldn't be. No wonder this, (USA), county doesn't have a
> > decent nuclear program. It is the same stupid ignorance all over again.
> >
> > Best, Dan.
> >
>
> Cool, Dan. I am prepared to believe.
>
> Obviously, you have "done the math." Show us "the math."
So we can show you where it is in error.
-- Many thanks, Don Lancaster Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552 voice: (928)428-4073 email: don@tinaja.com Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com
- Next message: If I told U I'd have 2 kill U: "Those Darn Ruskies"
- Previous message: Dan Bloomquist: "Re: knocking wind"
- In reply to: Al Smith: "Re: knocking wind"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]