Re: useful analogy
From: ziliath (ziliath_at_myway.com)
Date: 08/31/04
- Next message: ziliath: "Re: useful analogy"
- Previous message: Don Lancaster: "Re: Solar-Thermal vs Photo-electric"
- In reply to: Jim Richardson: "Re: useful analogy"
- Next in thread: Hatunen: "Re: useful analogy"
- Reply: Hatunen: "Re: useful analogy"
- Reply: Jim Richardson: "Re: useful analogy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 31 Aug 2004 12:36:33 -0700
Jim Richardson <warlock@eskimo.com> wrote in message news:<u7rd02-
> You denature alchohol, and thus, are not
> making alchohol that falls under the various drink related laws. One way
> of denaturing ethanol, is to mix a percentage of methanol into it, feel
> free to drink all you want. Better make an eye appointment first, it
> won't help, but they can also fit you for a cane and dark glasses at the
> same time.
Your inability to reason logically is sadly apparent. Before denaturing,
one has drinkable ethanol, which can be spirited away to bottling plants
anytime. Therefore during Prohibition the production of it was not allowed
and would have that impinged on the manufacture of subsequent products
such as denatured.
> Yes, "industrial ethanol" is, was, and has been, legal to produce in
> these united states.
Dream on, son.
- Next message: ziliath: "Re: useful analogy"
- Previous message: Don Lancaster: "Re: Solar-Thermal vs Photo-electric"
- In reply to: Jim Richardson: "Re: useful analogy"
- Next in thread: Hatunen: "Re: useful analogy"
- Reply: Hatunen: "Re: useful analogy"
- Reply: Jim Richardson: "Re: useful analogy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|