Re: useful analogy
From: ziliath (ziliath_at_myway.com)
Date: 09/01/04
- Next message: Karl Johanson: "Re: Wind Power"
- Previous message: Fred B. McGalliard: "Re: Wind Power"
- In reply to: Jim Richardson: "Re: useful analogy"
- Next in thread: Jim Richardson: "Re: useful analogy"
- Reply: Jim Richardson: "Re: useful analogy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 1 Sep 2004 10:18:27 -0700
Jim Richardson <warlock@eskimo.com> wrote in message
> Have a 200 liter drum of ethanol at work, no
> liquor tax paid on it, it's not for consumption, and was legally
> purchased, and legally manufactured, in the US.
Did you buy it back during Prohibition? If not I don't see how
the madness of those days can be denied using present-day evidence.
- Next message: Karl Johanson: "Re: Wind Power"
- Previous message: Fred B. McGalliard: "Re: Wind Power"
- In reply to: Jim Richardson: "Re: useful analogy"
- Next in thread: Jim Richardson: "Re: useful analogy"
- Reply: Jim Richardson: "Re: useful analogy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]