Re: useful analogy
From: N. Thornton (bigcat_at_meeow.co.uk)
Date: 09/04/04
- Next message: Dr. Jai Maharaj: "Re: PROFILE OF ABUSER ALAN SCHWARTZ aka 'Uncle Al' <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com>"
- Previous message: G. R. L. Cowan: "Re: Vehicle of the Future."
- In reply to: Jim Richardson: "Re: useful analogy"
- Next in thread: Jim Richardson: "Re: useful analogy"
- Reply: Jim Richardson: "Re: useful analogy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 4 Sep 2004 12:52:14 -0700
Jim Richardson <warlock@eskimo.com> wrote in message news:<7kgg02-0vv.ln1@grendel.myth>...
> The problem with using alchohol as a replacement for petroleum fuel, is
> the biomass required to produce it in the first place. We use *way* too
> much gasoline &etc to replace it all with biomass alchohol. Converting
> some of the "waste" to alchohol or other fuels is a possibility, but it
> won't *replace* gasoline/diesel use, only supplement it.
correct, but AFAIC see thats not a problem :)
NT
- Next message: Dr. Jai Maharaj: "Re: PROFILE OF ABUSER ALAN SCHWARTZ aka 'Uncle Al' <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com>"
- Previous message: G. R. L. Cowan: "Re: Vehicle of the Future."
- In reply to: Jim Richardson: "Re: useful analogy"
- Next in thread: Jim Richardson: "Re: useful analogy"
- Reply: Jim Richardson: "Re: useful analogy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|