Re: Oil Spicket Going Dry
From: Don (one-if-by-land_at_concord.com)
Date: 10/08/04
- Next message: Jim: "Re: Oil over $51 a barrel"
- Previous message: Fred B. McGalliard: "Re: 12 Years Ago"
- In reply to: Tim O'Flaherty: "Re: Oil Spicket Going Dry"
- Next in thread: Tim O'Flaherty: "Re: Oil Spicket Going Dry"
- Reply: Tim O'Flaherty: "Re: Oil Spicket Going Dry"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 21:23:07 GMT
"Tim O'Flaherty"> wrote
> [ In 1970, a bushel of wheat could be traded for a barrel of oil in the
> world market. It now takes nine bushels of wheat to buy a barrel of oil. ]
What would you rather have, food or gas?
Just hold back on the food and the oil price will plummet.
> It will only get worse as oil becomes more expensive. Takes oil to make
> and
> ship grain too unless we want to use horses and sailing ships.
If they are buying, then they can come pick it up too.
Again, who is hungrier, the man with the food or the man with the oil?
- Next message: Jim: "Re: Oil over $51 a barrel"
- Previous message: Fred B. McGalliard: "Re: 12 Years Ago"
- In reply to: Tim O'Flaherty: "Re: Oil Spicket Going Dry"
- Next in thread: Tim O'Flaherty: "Re: Oil Spicket Going Dry"
- Reply: Tim O'Flaherty: "Re: Oil Spicket Going Dry"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]