Re: Solid Hydrogen, Sonofusion
From: Thomas Lee Elifritz (crackpots_at_everywhere.net)
Date: 10/30/04
- Next message: Patrick Powers: "Re: Wind energy a boon for farmers - tenfold returns !"
- Previous message: Franz Heymann: "Re: Can hydrogen deliver?"
- In reply to: Franz Heymann: "Re: Solid Hydrogen, Sonofusion"
- Next in thread: Franz Heymann: "Re: Solid Hydrogen, Sonofusion"
- Reply: Franz Heymann: "Re: Solid Hydrogen, Sonofusion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 07:06:35 GMT
October 30, 2004
Franz Heymann wrote:
> > > Hydrogen cannot undergo any direct fusion reaction.
> >
> > Who are we to believe, Franz or Hans?
> >
> > http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/energy/ppchain.html
> >
> > > You have a problem getting rid of one unit of positive charge.
> >
> > Not a problem in this universe.
> >
> >
> http://genesismission.jpl.nasa.gov/science/mod3_SunlightSolarHeat/FusionChemistry/
> .
> I said Hydrogen cannot undergo any direct fusion reaction. If it
> could, the lifetime of the sun would have been a mere matter of a few
> seconds, and not billions of years, The process by which Hydrogen is
> converted into Heluim in the sun involves a series of successive
> reactions,
The first of which is the direct fusion of hydrogen.
> including an essential stage in which the weak interaction
> is involved. The weak interaction derived its name from the fact
> thgat it is very weak.
And charge is conserved by positron emission and subsequent electron positron
annihilation, contrary to your claim of it being a problem. Mistakes are ok, I make
them all the time, but you just lie, by omission, and spin, and your superficial
understanding of physics, in order to avoid actually having to do any physics to
improve peoples lives. Also distinctly absent from any of your arguments are scholarly
references, citations and internet links to references, thus, you promulgate
scientific ignorance, disinformation and apathy.
The situation is analogous to electrolysis of water, the dissociation proceeds by
reaction steps, but the end result is the same, hydrogen and oxygen. To claim that
hydrogen does not undergo fusion is like claiming hydroxide does not dissociate and
recombine, or that hydronium is an aberration, protium is not a proper term, or that
energy and power are often used interchangeably in common speech. It is the simple
scientific dishonesty of an inflexible absolutist with little appreciation for the
specific details and broad richness of scientific methods and results.
http://www.muguet.com/research.html
Thomas Lee Elifritz
http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net
.
- Next message: Patrick Powers: "Re: Wind energy a boon for farmers - tenfold returns !"
- Previous message: Franz Heymann: "Re: Can hydrogen deliver?"
- In reply to: Franz Heymann: "Re: Solid Hydrogen, Sonofusion"
- Next in thread: Franz Heymann: "Re: Solid Hydrogen, Sonofusion"
- Reply: Franz Heymann: "Re: Solid Hydrogen, Sonofusion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|