Re: Don't Shut Down Barsebäck 2! (Translation of our petition)
From: Rolf Martens (rolf.martens_at_mailbox.swipnet.se)
Date: 11/01/04
- Next message: Rolf Martens: "Re: THE END IS NEAR (NOPE, just for some!)"
- Previous message: Robert F. Heeter: "Conventional Fusion FAQ Section 0/11 (Intro) Part 1/3 (Overview)"
- In reply to: Rolf Martens: "Re: Shut Down Barsebäck 2! (Translation of our petition)"
- Next in thread: Thomas Lee Elifritz: "Re: Shut Down Barsebäck 2! (Translation of our petition)"
- Reply: Thomas Lee Elifritz: "Re: Shut Down Barsebäck 2! (Translation of our petition)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 09:10:53 +0100
In article <AU_gd.10524$1p.8688@nntpserver.swip.net>,
rolf.martens@mailbox.swipnet.se says...
>
>
>In article <nKugd.3182$Fg2.1288688@newshog.newsread.com>,
>crackpots@everywhere.net says...
>>
>>
>>October 29, 2004
>>
>>Rolf Martens wrote:
>>
>>>Shut Down Barsebäck 2! (Translation of our petition)
>>>
>>>We, the undersigned, demand that the Swedish government
>>>immediately implement its plans to cause the nuclear power
>>>reactor Barsebäck 2 in southern Sweden to be shut down and
>>>later destroyed.
>>>
>>
>>Thomas Lee Elifritz
>>http://elifritz.members.atlantic.net
>
>No, I didn't write that - of course.
>
>This liar har replaced "cancel" with "implement".
>
>Rolf M.
And of course the header is as above - NOT the opposite.
Rolf M. (once more)
- Next message: Rolf Martens: "Re: THE END IS NEAR (NOPE, just for some!)"
- Previous message: Robert F. Heeter: "Conventional Fusion FAQ Section 0/11 (Intro) Part 1/3 (Overview)"
- In reply to: Rolf Martens: "Re: Shut Down Barsebäck 2! (Translation of our petition)"
- Next in thread: Thomas Lee Elifritz: "Re: Shut Down Barsebäck 2! (Translation of our petition)"
- Reply: Thomas Lee Elifritz: "Re: Shut Down Barsebäck 2! (Translation of our petition)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]