Re: Confused Logic 101

From: Dan Bloomquist (EXTRApublic21_at_lakeweb.com)
Date: 11/08/04 

Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 19:19:53 GMT

Thomas Lee Elifritz wrote:
>
> http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/SOLAR/IRRADIANCE/irrad.html
>
> The numbers are astounding. Plenty of energy.

Yea, we could do a lot with solar. The trouble is that we are at the
least a decade off from making it equitable. And if not sooner than
later, it is back to that human nature thing...

>
> Thomas Lee Elifritz

Best, Dan. 

-- 
http://lakeweb.net
http://ReserveAnalyst.com
No EXTRA stuff for email.
What can you see if you can't see it all...

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Confused Logic 101
    ... Thomas Lee Elifritz wrote: ... Yea, we could do a lot with solar. ... The trouble is that we are at the ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)
  • Re: Confused Logic 101
    ... > Yea, we could do a lot with solar. ... The trouble is that we are at the ... Solving the fundamental problem ...
    (sci.energy)
  • Re: Confused Logic 101
    ... > Yea, we could do a lot with solar. ... The trouble is that we are at the ... Solving the fundamental problem ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)
  • Re: Rutan: NASA Needs New Von Braun
    ... Thomas Lee Elifritz wrote: ... > world, and we are not a solar powered nation, neither are we a solar ... the entire basis of human civilization is ...
    (sci.space.policy)
Quantcast