Re: oil shale redux?
From: Robert Flory (wyogeo_at_MORETHANWARMmail.com)
Date: 11/29/04
- Next message: Bob Ehrlich: "Re: oil shale redux?"
- Previous message: rick++: "Re: oil shale redux?"
- In reply to: Bob Ehrlich: "Re: oil shale redux?"
- Next in thread: Michael Brennan : "Re: oil shale redux?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 09:54:58 GMT
to commit
a crime gets you an additional five years'.
What happens with a five year prison clause?
Well, let's say the person clicked on what turned out to be child pornography.
So they click on something else and that wipes it off the screen.
It's still sitting in their browser's cache.
* "Man Arrested After Retrieving Child Pornography by Computer"
* The New York Times, May 19, 1995
*
* A Los Angelos man has been arrested on charges of possessing child porno-
* graphy that he obtained over the Internet. His Internet traffic was under
* surveillance because he placed an ad seeking an "open relationship" with
* couples interested in "family nudity."
*
* City Attorney James K. Hahn said "Certainly if you see something flicker
* across your computer monitor, then you are not in possession, but if you
* go to the difficulty of downloading...then you're guilty."
As you can see, this technical detail totally escapes some people.
Continuing: then the Feds raid their place.
Naturally,
- Next message: Bob Ehrlich: "Re: oil shale redux?"
- Previous message: rick++: "Re: oil shale redux?"
- In reply to: Bob Ehrlich: "Re: oil shale redux?"
- Next in thread: Michael Brennan : "Re: oil shale redux?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|