Re: Nuclear plants say they deserve credit for 'green' energy
From: G. R. L. Cowan (gcowan_at_eagle.ca)
Date: 12/20/04
- Next message: Jo Stein: "Re: Nuclear plants say they deserve credit for 'green' energy"
- Previous message: G. R. L. Cowan: "Re: Road to Hydrogen Cars may not be so clean"
- In reply to: Alex Terrell: "Re: Nuclear plants say they deserve credit for 'green' energy"
- Next in thread: Jo Stein: "Re: Nuclear plants say they deserve credit for 'green' energy"
- Reply: Jo Stein: "Re: Nuclear plants say they deserve credit for 'green' energy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 09:18:43 -0500
Alex Terrell wrote:
>
> To some extent, Nuclear plants in Europe will be getting credit. Carbon
> trading is starting, and there is a cost of carbon of perhaps $20 per
> ton. This will add about 2c per KWHr to coal electricity, and about
> 0.5-1c per KWhr to gas, and nothing to nuclear.
>
> Renewables are supported further in most countries, so Nuclear is
> somewhat in between. However, many Governments are still dithering over
> whether to allow nuclear power. The recent UK white paper pushed it
> back, saying it was uncompetitive - never mind that Nuclear's
> competitiveness is an issue for industry, not Government, to worry
> about.
Governments do worry about the competitiveness of nuclear power,
though. It cuts into their fossil fuel income.
--- Graham Cowan
http://www.eagle.ca/~gcowan/Paper_for_11th_CHC.doc --
how individual mobility gains nuclear cachet
- Next message: Jo Stein: "Re: Nuclear plants say they deserve credit for 'green' energy"
- Previous message: G. R. L. Cowan: "Re: Road to Hydrogen Cars may not be so clean"
- In reply to: Alex Terrell: "Re: Nuclear plants say they deserve credit for 'green' energy"
- Next in thread: Jo Stein: "Re: Nuclear plants say they deserve credit for 'green' energy"
- Reply: Jo Stein: "Re: Nuclear plants say they deserve credit for 'green' energy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|