Re: Hydrino Power

From: Dan Bloomquist (EXTRApublic21_at_lakeweb.com)
Date: 01/13/05


Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 19:50:03 GMT


TheNightFly wrote:
> Not necessarely. The problem with peer reviews is that Mills' has no
> peers.

...

> place. So, while all hell hasn't broken loose in the scientific world
> due to
> ideology, politics and money...

You simply don't understand. If this new state of matter were observable
it would be big news. No, really really big news! It is virtually
impossible for all of science to ignore something so important.

TheNightFly wrote:
> Ya, I'm sure that's what all those poor unsuspecting
> corporate investors thought when they were handing
> over their tens of millions of dollars...

So, some investors 'believe' in Mills' claims therefor his claims must
be true? Some folks belive the world is flat too.

Best, Dan.

-- 
http://lakeweb.net
http://ReserveAnalyst.com
No EXTRA stuff for email.
What can you see if you can't see it all...


Relevant Pages

  • Re: Hydrino Power
    ... The problem with peer reviews is that Mills' has no ... > corporate investors thought when they were handing ... some investors 'believe' in Mills' claims therefor his claims must ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Hydrino Power
    ... The problem with peer reviews is that Mills' has no ... > corporate investors thought when they were handing ... some investors 'believe' in Mills' claims therefor his claims must ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)