Re: But There Ain't No Global Warming.

knews4u2chew_at_yahoo.com
Date: 01/17/05 

Date: 16 Jan 2005 19:35:07 -0800

Bill Ward wrote:
> On 16 Jan 2005 16:02:05 -0800, knews4u2chew@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> >
> >Bill Ward wrote:
> >> On 16 Jan 2005 11:45:48 -0800, knews4u2chew@yahoo.com wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Bill Ward wrote:
> >> >> On 16 Jan 2005 11:16:27 -0800, knews4u2chew@yahoo.com wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >http://www.spiritofmaat.com/announce/ann_dryice.htm
> >
> ><snip worthless tactics>
> >
> >Here I did it for you Mr. "Science."
> >
> >"polar ice melt"
>
>http://www.google.com/search?tab=gw&q=%22polar%20ice%20melt%22&hl=en&
> >
> >Try reading before you post disinfo so fast as to not even have had
> >time to read the cited article.
>
> That was a Google search, and one of the first hits was:
>
> http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/wea00/wea00166.htm
>
> In that I found:
>
> [Begin quote]
> Global warming, if it is indeed occurring, has been slight
> so far. I say "if it is indeed
> occurring", because the ability to measure
> surface and upper atmospheric temperatures over the past
> hundred years or so and our understanding
> of how to average the temperatures from measurement stations
> over that period is still debated and
> being investigated. A slight warming trend appears
> to have occurred over the past 100 years, although most of
> that has occurred since World War II and
> especially since the early 1980s. Whether this has been
> caused by man or is part of a natural
> cycle (or perhaps both) remains to be shown.
>
> Recent data suggest that the polar ice has not decreased as
> at first thought, but, for the North
> pole in particular, may have slightly thinned due to a
> natural cycle. This requires more study.
> The ice cap on Greenland has not changed in total amount,
> but in extent, having increased in
> thickness in the central part of the island while decreasing
> in depth near the coast. Some
> glaciers are decreasing in some areas of the world, but are
> increasing in others. There is a
> lot of seemingly contradictory information that has yet to
> be sorted out in the global climate
> change picture.
> [End quote]
>
> I'm not going to get in a battle of wits with an unarmed
> person, I'm just showing you that there is more to the issue
> than you apparently realize. A Google search is a pointer
> to potential references, not a reference in itself. Try
> actually reading and understanding the references you post.
>
> Regards,
>
> Bill Ward

And, SO, you know more than the Union of Concerned Scientists?
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22union+of+concerned+scientists*+global+warming*%22&btnG=Search
Your posts are garbage.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: But There Aint No Global Warming.
    ... Bill Ward wrote: ... >>Try reading before you post disinfo so fast as to not even have had ... > actually reading and understanding the references you post. ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)
  • Re: But There Aint No Global Warming.
    ... Bill Ward wrote: ... >>Try reading before you post disinfo so fast as to not even have had ... > actually reading and understanding the references you post. ...
    (sci.energy)
  • Re: But There Aint No Global Warming.
    ... Bill Ward wrote: ... >>Try reading before you post disinfo so fast as to not even have had ... > actually reading and understanding the references you post. ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)
  • Re: But There Aint No Global Warming.
    ... Bill Ward wrote: ... >>Try reading before you post disinfo so fast as to not even have had ... > actually reading and understanding the references you post. ...
    (sci.energy)
  • Re: But There Aint No Global Warming.
    ... Bill Ward wrote: ... A slight warming trend appears ... > actually reading and understanding the references you post. ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)