Re: Wind energy extraction
From: habshi (habshi_at_anony.net)
Date: 01/21/05
- Next message: habshi: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- Previous message: G. R. L. Cowan: "Re: But There Ain't No Global Warming."
- In reply to: daestrom: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- Next in thread: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- Reply: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 18:02:23 GMT
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:05:54 GMT, "daestrom" <daestrom@NO_SPAM_HEREtwcny.rr.com> wrote:
Nonsense. A funnel of, oh say, 5m diameter with a 'high speed windmill'
would *definitely* cost more than a three-blade windmill of 5m diameter.
The weight of the funnel and support structure would be much larger than
that of a windmill/turbine of similar cross-sectional area. <
The funnels would rest on the ground. The windmill would be at the opening of the 1m end
- Next message: habshi: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- Previous message: G. R. L. Cowan: "Re: But There Ain't No Global Warming."
- In reply to: daestrom: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- Next in thread: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- Reply: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]