Re: Global dimming masking greenhouse effect
From: Axel Berger (Axel_Berger_at_b.maus.de)
Date: 01/21/05
- Next message: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- Previous message: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- In reply to: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Global dimming masking greenhouse effect"
- Next in thread: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Global dimming masking greenhouse effect"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 14:09:00 +0100
*jimp* wrote on Fri, 05-01-21 00:28:
>I would be very surprised if the probability of it happening is greater
>than my winning the lotto this weekend.
As you can easily observe, with enough players the probability of the
lottery being won is not low. It is the same with starting fires. You
may as well accept it as given that some tree, bush or patch of grass
will burn for whatever reason. The only relevant question is whether
this fire will spread or will be self limiting.
- Next message: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- Previous message: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Wind energy extraction"
- In reply to: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Global dimming masking greenhouse effect"
- Next in thread: jimp_at_specsol-spam-sux.com: "Re: Global dimming masking greenhouse effect"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
