Re: Electrolysis
From: Alan Combellack (acombellack_at_nspmsympatico.ca)
Date: 01/30/05
- Next message: habshi: "Solar boats and rickshaws a big hit"
- Previous message: Ed Earl Ross: "Re: Electrolysis"
- In reply to: Ed Earl Ross: "Re: Electrolysis"
- Next in thread: Hatunen: "Re: Electrolysis"
- Reply: Hatunen: "Re: Electrolysis"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 09:29:19 -0500
Thanks very much. That was quick! My Outlook Express is set to top post,
apparently, but henceforth I shall attempt to follow the format used by the
poster to whom I am responding.
Alan C
"Ed Earl Ross" <edearl@satx.rr.com> wrote in message
news:RJ5Ld.8977$V51.5693@fe1.texas.rr.com...
> Alan Combellack wrote:
>> "Dan Bloomquist" <EXTRApublic21@lakeweb.com> wrote in message
>> news:41FC3DB5.5050008@lakeweb.com...
>>
>>>
>>>Steve Spence wrote:
>>>
>>>>Neither is feasible. Hydrogen comes from fossil fuels.
>>>
>>>I won't bother to ask you to stop top posting.
>>>
>>
>> I see this comment from time to time. I don't particularly want to
>> offend people but I don't know what "top posting" means. Does it mean
>> that one's reply is placed above the copy of the OP? If so, what is
>> wrong with it? If not, what is it?
>> Alan C
> Yes, that is what it means. I prefer to adapt to the style of a thread,
> rather than be disruptive. Some people want to follow the guidelines for
> posting, but many folks like bottom posting.
- Next message: habshi: "Solar boats and rickshaws a big hit"
- Previous message: Ed Earl Ross: "Re: Electrolysis"
- In reply to: Ed Earl Ross: "Re: Electrolysis"
- Next in thread: Hatunen: "Re: Electrolysis"
- Reply: Hatunen: "Re: Electrolysis"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|